Re: [boost] [proto] transform for flattening an expression - how?

From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-20 11:04:10

Steven Watanabe wrote:
> In that case, since Marcus wants a larger arity for automatically 
> generated exprs
> rather than ones created using operators, couldn't you set the max
> arity for the function call overloads separately from the max expr 
> arity?  How
> are compile times if you keep the function call arity fixed at 5?

That's an interesting suggestion. I'll try that when I have a chance and 
report the results.

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com