|
|
Boost : |
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-24 00:12:47
Barco You wrote:
> I feel class template has already been like this way. How's necessary for
> smart object?
The main tools I am proposing are for safe and efficient usage of
various flavors of runtime polymorphism and dynamic typing.
Templates provide duck-typing and with Concepts they can do structural
subtyping too, but only at compile-time.
> Do you mean we should have a basic object like java's from which everything
> derives?
Not at all.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk