Re: [boost] Giving names to formal parameters of lambda expressions: a named placeholder trick.

From: shunsuke (pstade.mb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-31 21:03:37

Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
> This is in fact the reason for my compose<> template idea: If you
> can't avoid writing a type expression, you might as well just write
> that.

BTW, Boost.Egg has the potential to implement your compose.

     typedef result_of_lazy<fold>::type fold_;
     typedef result_of_lazy<reverse>::type reverse_;
     typedef return_of<fold_(reverse_(T_bll_1), T_bll_2, T_bll_3)>::type reverse_fold;

A showstopper is that it is difficult to offer static-initialization way.

Regards,

-- 
Shunsuke Sogame