From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-02 11:05:38
Just a quick question. Wouldn't be TBB the better choice instead of OpenMP?
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Doug Gregor <dgregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Cristianno Martins wrote:
> > As I said in last e-mails, I'm interested in Boost projects to GSoC.
> > Now, I
> > have write a proposal and submit it to GSoC, but I'll really
> > appreciate if
> > anyone comment my idea. (I can change something wrong or strange yet)
> > Well, I'm proposing to parallelize one or more libraries in Boost,
> > using
> > OpenMP to do this. Basically, I'll choose a library, review its
> > source code,
> > identify and parallelize the bottlenecks, and document the strategy
> > and
> > results. These steps will be done iteratively during the project.
> That is certainly an interesting project. When you submit your GSoC
> application, please identify exactly which library you plan to
> parallelize with OpenMP, and which parts of that library you will
> - Doug
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk