From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-03 14:45:15
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Felipe Magno de Almeida
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Andrey Semashev <andysem_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Beman Dawes wrote:
> > > Changes I'd like to see include:
> > >
> > > * Drop Microsoft VC++ 7.1. Supporting two versions (9.0 and 8.0) is
> > > about all we can afford.
> > I'd like to kindly ask to continue supporting VC 7.1 at least for a
> > release or two. This compiler is still rather popular and is quite
> > capable to compile modern C++.
> Me too.
> There isn't even much difference from MSVC 7.1 and the new 9.0.
> Most people don't find compelling to upgrade just to get NRVO basically.
Sorry to reply to myself, but I only second this request *if* there's
a regular regression tester to this platform. If there's enough
testing, I don't see why we should drop support for it.
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk