From: Martin Bonner (Martin.Bonner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-04 05:35:14
From: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz
> Beman Dawes <bdawes <at> acm.org> writes:
>> In proposing additions, please remember that each added compiler
>> costs us resources such as developer's time, and that our
>> regression report processing system is easy to overload. Also,
>> we won't accept a new platform unless someone is willing to run
>> *daily* regression tests for it.
> I'd like to bring the following idea for discussion: Besides
> mainstream platforms, additional, more exotic platforms can be
> provisionally included into the supported set *provided that*
> they are associated to a volunteer *platform champion*. A platform
> champion will
[snip - "ensure the platform works"]
> If the champion resigns or is not able to keep a high quality
> level on the platform, the platform is dropped.
> Does this make sense?
It sounds like an absolutely /excellent/ plan to me. Apart from
anything else, it formalizes what somebody needs to do in order to get
their favourite platform supported.
-- Martin Bonner Senior Software Engineer/Team Leader PI SHURLOK LTD Telephone: +44 1223 441434 / 203894 (direct) Fax: +44 1223 203999 Email: martin.bonner_at_[hidden] www.pi-shurlok.com disclaimer
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk