From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-06 17:13:33
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Review Request: Generalization of the Pimpl idiom
>> By the way, do you plan to parameterize the number of arguments allowed,
>> using maybe preprocessor metaprogramming? Yes I know that this is quite
>> but do not limit the user of the library.
> Can you show me it could be done. I've started playing with boost::mpl but
> still do not see I could apply it for variable arguments.
No, you can't have variadic templates with template metaprogramming. Sorry,
you should use PREPROCESSOR programming. I have never use it yet, but
waiting from variadic templates it seams the single way.
>> Let me know if I can help you with the shared memory
> That'd be great. I'd integrate and reflect that in the header. If you go
> ahead with that, please wrap that in
> #if 1.35 < BOOST_VERSION
> so that it still works with older versions of Boost that I have to use.
I was proposing to help you with the shared memory issues, not to do it. Any
way, I could start with the first ideas, but I can not manage with the
Vicente Juan Botet Escriba
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk