Re: [boost] boost::result_of and C++03

From: Daniel Walker (daniel.j.walker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-07 12:19:07

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> And is there a plan in C++0x
> to require std::result_of to be implemented in terms of decltype?

Yes. There was a proposal to remove the result_type/result<> heuristic
described in TR1 3.4/3 entirely since implementers can just use
decltype.

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2194.pdf

I'm not sure if that's been accepted by the committee yet or not.

Daniel