Boost logo

Boost :

From: Daniel Walker (daniel.j.walker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-07 12:19:07

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> And is there a plan in C++0x
> to require std::result_of to be implemented in terms of decltype?

Yes. There was a proposal to remove the result_type/result<> heuristic
described in TR1 3.4/3 entirely since implementers can just use

I'm not sure if that's been accepted by the committee yet or not.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at