From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-08 04:18:53
Peter Dimov wrote:
> I wrote:
>> This isn't particularly odd or surprising. But I think that
>> config_test ought to fail on these platforms, for the same reason my
>> tests fail. The reason the test passes is because
>> boost_has_pthreads.ipp and boost_has_sched_yield.ipp are too
> The tests are indeed too permissive... but the real reason is that
> config_test is always run with <threading>multi, so the default
> configuration is never tested. Is this correct? Most of our other
> tests do not use <threading>multi, so it seems reasonable to run
> config_test in this mode as well (in addition to the existing
> <threading>multi run).
Ah, I'll add another build variant for that test.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk