From: Daniel Frey (d.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-09 17:26:18
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 17:06 -0400, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> think of. Of course, you would still be inflicted with a vtable, but that
> doesn't add any per-object space overhead, which seems to be what you're most
> concerned about.
A vtable means that the per-object size *does* grow, since each object
needs a pointer to the vtable.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk