Boost logo

Boost :

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-12 12:07:56

Frank Mori Hess:

> I'd say go with the 1.35-like implementation. I think using
> sp_accept_owner is preferable to shared_from_this in constructors, due to
> the exception concerns I posted about earlier:


So you suggest we throw your improved implementation away? :-) This doesn't
seem right to me, as it represents a fair amount of knowledge that will be
lost. Maybe we need to move it somewhere, to
boost/smart_ptr/esft_constructor_base.hpp, for instance? And link it from
the docs.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at