From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-13 21:31:09
Is there a reason why you removed the (new) Spirit V2 tests?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-
> bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rene Rivera
> Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 5:31 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] Normalizing wayward status/Jamfile.v2 tests.
> New subject for the benefit of those not reading every post...
> Rene Rivera wrote:
> > Peter Dimov wrote:
> >> Rene Rivera:
> >>> Peter Dimov wrote:
> >>>> Unfortunately some libraries - pool among them - do not have
> >>>> their tests factored out in this way and are instead inlined into
> >>>> status/Jamfile.v2.
> >>> Perhaps we should fix that?
> >> We just need a volunteer who is not afraid of Jamfiles. :-)
> > Done for the array tests.
> Done for the CRC tests.
> I figure I might as well fix as many as I can now, at the start of the
> release cycle. So that we catch any problems on this early. But the
> config tests are rather difficult to deal with. John any chance of
> fixing the config tests for this release?
> -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
> -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
> -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com
> -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk