Boost logo

Boost :

From: Boris Gubenko (Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-15 16:21:42

A quick update: we're trying to build GCC 4.3.0 on HP-UX/ia64 and
when we're done, I'll switch to this compiler. I hope I'll be able
to run Boost test in both C++0x and C++98 mode, both trunk and
release branch.

It is not clear yet whether we can upgrade the GCC compiler on a
Linux machine I use for Boost testing.

I have a question: for testing Boost 1.35, all one had to do was
to specify "--tag=branches/release" on command. Is this the
same with Boost 1.36? I.e. is it correct that branches/release
always represents the current development Boost release?


----- Original Message -----
From: <boost_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Cc: "boris gubenko" <boris.gubenko_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [1.36.0] High priority compilers for this release?

> Beman Dawes wrote:
>> Good! Let me know which GCC version you settle on.
> Will do.
>> I'd like a Linux/ia64 release tester. Whichever version makes the most
>> sense. If you could handle the release testing for that.
> Yes, I can. Again, I'll see if we can upgrade to a more recent
> version of GCC on this Linux machine.
> Thanks,
> Boris
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at