Re: [boost] Review Request: future library (Gaskill version)

From: Kowalke Oliver (QD IT PA AS) (Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-16 05:34:44

Is there a schedule for a review of this library?

> I wanted to formally request a review of my Futures library.
> Latest Version: http://braddock.com/~braddock/future/
>
> The library has matured greatly over the past year.  It has
> been heavily used as a key component in a mid-sized
> commercial application on both Linux and Windows.  Extensive
> unit tests and (just
> now) documentation have been written - in fact there are more
> than twice as many lines of test code and documentation than
> are in the library proper.
>
> The library incorporates many ideas from this list, from
> other prospective submissions, other languages, and from
> academic papers.
>
> The library does not currently use jamfiles or boostdoc (I
> tried I really did).  It is a header-only library.  The
> documentation is currently straight HTML, and should be very
> easy to translate to boostdoc if the submission looks good.
>
> NOTE - to avoid confusion, note that there is an older 2005
> boost.future candidate in the vault by Thorsten Schuett that
> is not related to mine (although it was studied early on).
>
> Thanks,
> Braddock Gaskill
> braddock_at_[hidden]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>