Boost logo

Boost :

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-21 15:42:16


Juergen Hunold:
...
> I've got a small fix attached which (hopefully) initialises "rqtp"
> completely in the initialiser list and removes the (hopefully)
> redundant assignments.

     else
     {
- struct timespec rqtp = { 0 };
+ struct timespec rqtp = { 0, 1000 };

- rqtp.tv_sec = 0;
- rqtp.tv_nsec = 1000;
-
         nanosleep( &rqtp, 0 );
     }

POSIX says that struct timespec has at least the members tv_sec and tv_nsec,
but it doesn't guarantee their order or placement. Does

    struct timespec rqtp = {};

still emit the warnings?


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk