Boost logo

Boost :

From: Daniel Frey (d.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-23 16:59:39

On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 01:54 +0300, Peter Dimov wrote:
> 1. Changes esft.hpp to use the shared_count constructor to eliminate the
> circular initialization instead of sp_accept_owner overload(
> sp_deleter_wrapper* ). Stylistic change, not necessary, avoids testing a
> possible use of the sp_accept_owner mechanism.

I just noticed that by replacing _internal_shared_this with
_internal_shared_count (and saving one plain pointer), the
sp_accept_owner overload you mentioned is no longer called - there is
simply no shared_ptr ctor involved, otherwise the optimization would not
have been possible.

Is it OK to remove the overload now?

Regards, Daniel

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at