Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Tom Brinkman (reportbase_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-25 21:38:10

Next message: Sohail Somani: "Re: [boost] But it would Re: [gil] [announcement] New IO lib"
Previous message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [shifted_ptr][3.0] Important bugs fixes"
Next in thread: Sohail Somani: "Re: [boost] But it would Re: [gil] [announcement] New IO lib"
Reply: Sohail Somani: "Re: [boost] But it would Re: [gil] [announcement] New IO lib"
Reply: John Femiani: "Re: [boost] But it would Re: [gil] [announcement] New IO lib"
Maybe reply: Tom Brinkman: "Re: [boost] But it would Re: [gil] [announcement] New IO lib"

>> But it would introduce the dependency to boost::filesystem

That would be a show-stopper for shur. I definately could not use
your IO library if it had a boost::filesystem dependency. PLEASE -
keep it header only.

Next message: Sohail Somani: "Re: [boost] But it would Re: [gil] [announcement] New IO lib"
Previous message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [shifted_ptr][3.0] Important bugs fixes"
Next in thread: Sohail Somani: "Re: [boost] But it would Re: [gil] [announcement] New IO lib"
Reply: Sohail Somani: "Re: [boost] But it would Re: [gil] [announcement] New IO lib"
Reply: John Femiani: "Re: [boost] But it would Re: [gil] [announcement] New IO lib"
Maybe reply: Tom Brinkman: "Re: [boost] But it would Re: [gil] [announcement] New IO lib"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk