Boost logo

Boost :

From: Sohail Somani (sohail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-26 18:10:09

Tom Brinkman wrote:
>>> Can you please elaborate on what makes a non-header-only library so very
>>> problematic?
> Its probably more a UNIX thing, I'm not sure if windows developers
> could care one way or another.
> But on LINUX/UNIX, there is a central repository of pre-built
> libraries that we syncronize our
> builds against.

Why don't you rebuild your dependent libraries along with your code?
Then you are guaranteed to have the right stuff. I mean, you already
said you would like to recompile everything over and over with
header-only stuff. Might as well make it official.

Sohail Somani

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at