From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-29 11:06:57
Hi guys, sorry for being so unresponsive. I took a short vacation to
recharge my batteries.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 6:20 AM, John Femiani <JOHN.FEMIANI_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > >> But it would introduce the dependency to boost::filesystem
> > That would be a show-stopper for shur. I definately could not use
> > your IO library if it had a boost::filesystem dependency. PLEASE -
> > keep it header only.
> I assume Christian was referring to the extension function in boost
> filesystem -- I can't really think of why else filesystem would be used
> to provide the feature I was asking about, which was a read_image
> function that would choose the appropriate file format based on the name
> or first bytes of the file.
Yes, if I would have to implement such a feature, I would use
boost::filesystem. What's the point of having such a lib when nobody
is using it? Also, I have some dependencies to boost::filesystem
already in io_new. But they are all wrapped by ADD_FS_PATH_SUPPORT.
On the other hand I don't get why boost::filesystem isn't header only?
Asio managed to do that, why not filesystem? I think both libs are
more or less thin wrappers around operation system's SDKs. Please
correct me if I'm wrong.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk