From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-30 08:16:03
Paul A Bristow wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
>> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Hervé Brönnimann
>> Sent: 30 April 2008 12:20
>> To: boost_at_[hidden]
>> Subject: Re: [boost] [Math/nextafter] A question of naming
>> floatdistance(lhs, rhs)?
> Would adding an underscore be nicer:
> FPT float_distance(FPT lhs, FPT rhs);
That's more to the Boost style of things.
> And to be clear, this (and the other next functions) *only* apply to
> floating-point types. (not integer, not decimal, not interval,
> or any other type)?
AS far as the current implementation is concerned it's strictly limited to
floating point values, represented in base 2.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk