From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-30 10:52:18
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008 00:55:03 brass goowy wrote:
>> Ulrich Eckhardt writes:
>>> * When I'm testing different compiler settings trying to get another few
>>> percent of performance, I don't have to compile another Boost version for
>>> each compiler setting.
>> I think you have to rebuild the compile_inplace.cpp file each time you want
>> to test a different compiler setting. I don't find an advantage to what
>> you advocate here.
> The simple advantage is that you don't have to use bjam but you can simply use
> the buildsystem (if any) you are using for the rest of your project.
How does compiling N source files vs. compiling one source file change
wether you need Boost Build or not? Especially since Boost Build is not
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk