From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-02 11:59:48
Maik Beckmann wrote:
> Am Freitag 02 Mai 2008 16:21:08 schrieb Neal Becker:
>> Matthias Troyer wrote:
>> > It seems that BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_INT64_T is not defined correctly for
>> > this compiler
>> Do you know where to fix this?
> Patch is attached.
> Robert knows this, since I sent him this patch two weeks ago.
> Maybe I should have opened a bug report to make the patch public
> -- Maik
Also, shouldn't we give an error if ULONG_MAX is undef'd at this point?
Would have saved me some time.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk