Re: [boost] Geometry Template Library from Intel

From: Bruno Lalande (bruno.lalande_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-03 07:29:50

>  Yes, although I still maintain that it shouldn't be called a
>  PointConcept.  You show your "value" template function that does
>  basically the same thing as boost::get.
>
>  Instead of:
>
>  brunos::value<0>(myvec);
>
>  it should be:
>
>  boost::get<0>(myvec);
>
>  IMHO...

Yes, the value<>() function will surely be renamed into get<>() in
order to have a common interface with tuples. And using boost::get<>()
can be made possible quite easily, I think. The big advantage is that
it becomes even easier to build a point from a tuple.

Bruno