From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-05 19:15:42
Simonson, Lucanus J wrote:
> I've been working on an idea for using some compile time concept type
> introspection and tag dispatching to allow generically named free
> functions (such as contains()) to compile and work in user code when
> called with any sensible combination of geometry types. This should
> make user code much more concise than with my current design; all the
> concept related boilerplate can be dispensed with.
> Do you guys prefer this scheme to what I showed in example3.cpp?
I haven't looked at your code yet, but it feels sound. This is
basically how fusion, MPL, &c. work, BTW.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk