From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-10 20:06:56
John Maddock wrote:
> * This takes an absolute age to run... isn't there a better way than
> processing all the Boost headers separately?
I think this is fixed now. Only the headers that are #included will be
> * If a failure occurs and I re-run the Jamfile, then it just goes off
> processing all the Boost headers all over again, so there's some dependency
> analysis missing somewhere :-(
This should be fixed.
The code is in the sandbox
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk