Re: [boost] [units] failures in tests and untested non-SI code

From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-14 12:49:02

AMDG

Zach Laine wrote:
> I'm relieved that it was so simple.  I added ::unit_type, which fixed
> things for me.  I agree, that static_assert could use a comment. :)
>
> So, am I going to experience much pain if I continue using 1.35.0 and
> the sandbox units/ directory?  Or should I use trunk to evaluate
> Units?
>   

It's probably safest to use the trunk.  At the moment only cmath.hpp
depends on boost/math, though and I'll hold back on pow, since
these are implementation details.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe