From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-16 18:22:06
Both implementation of futures used at least two call to new, one for T and
one for the common class between the future and the promise.
Le me kno if I have missed something, do we really need the shared_ptr<T>?
can't we use the future_object/future_impl class to store directly T.
On the Anthony implementation we see already the intent to use allocators
for the promise construction
// template <class Allocator> explicit promise(Allocator a);
but not for the new T in
typedef boost::scoped_ptr<T> storage_type;
static void init(storage_type& storage,source_reference_type
Anthony, do you plan to use the same allocator for T?
Braddock, do you plan to use allocators?
Vicente Juan Botet Escriba
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk