|
|
Boost : |
From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-17 13:44:59
On 05/17/08 10:52, Larry Evans wrote:
[snip]
> me to see this on that page. IOW, that page could specifically say that
> transform compositions are not possible because a transform
> expects Expr& and when transforms are composed without storing
> intermediate values in a variable, then the 1st transform produces
> an Expr and not an Expr&; so, the second transform rejects it.
Except when the composed transforms are pass_through transforms.
In this case, it works, as shown by compiling the attached, which
is a slight modification of previous attachment. That
seems inconsistent or, at least, unexpected behavior for transforms.
What's the rationale for this behavior?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk