|
Boost : |
From: Boris Gubenko (Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-20 13:25:19
Rene Rivera wrote:
> We can still get the 1.35.0 results. We just need volunteers to run the
> regression results against 'tags/release/1_35_0'. And if we have those
> results, I could turn around and generate the expected_results.xml.
I can do it for HP platforms.
Thanks,
Boris
----- Original Message -----
From: <boost_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] regression results for the release?
> Beman Dawes wrote:
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> http://www.boost.org/development/testing.html quoth:
>>>
>>> Will all Boost libraries work with your compiler? Unfortunately, the
>>> answer is "it depends". See the regression testing results to see
>>> exactly what works and what doesn't.
>>>
>>> But when I "see the regression testing results," all I see are results
>>> for the trunk and the release branch. If I'm an ordinary user, I'm
>>> using the 1.35.0 _release_. Do those libraries work with my compiler?
>>
>> Noted. One of the pushes for 1.36.0 will be to rewrite the release
>> procedures, and then actually follow them.
>
> We can still get the 1.35.0 results. We just need volunteers to run the
> regression results against 'tags/release/1_35_0'. And if we have those
> results, I could turn around and generate the expected_results.xml.
>
>
> --
> -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
> -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
> -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com
> -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk