From: James Porter (porterj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-21 12:08:26
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I don't think you can get rid of the overloads.
> The overloads are needed to implement the truth tables (see
Wouldn't it make more sense to use operator| instead of operator|| ?
When used in the context of boolean algebra, the former always carries
with it the expectation that there will be no short-circuiting. The
lack of short-circuiting makes overloading operator|| a headache for
users (though I can't imagine how you'd implement it to allow
The same (obviously) applies to operator&& as well. :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk