Re: [boost] CORBA iimplementation for Boost interest?

From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-21 15:52:30

Hi Jonathan,
All these are good news.

Continue and let us knwo any  major achievement on your development.

Cheers
Vicente

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jonathan Biggar" <jon_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] CORBA iimplementation for Boost interest?

> Here's a status report on my progress so far.
>
> Jonathan Biggar wrote:
>> So there appears to be some interest, and even more interest if it leads
>> to developing a new more modern C++ binding for CORBA.  But having an
>> implementation of the current binding would be a huge start for that.
>>
>> So on this basis, I plan to proceed.  Here's my plan to boostify the ORB:
>>
>>      1.  Remove the dependency on ACE thread, sockets and event dispatch
>>          classes and replacing them with the equivalents from boost.
>
> I now have a running ORB that only uses BOOST libraries.  There's
> probably some code that needs restructuring, since I used the ACE
> Reactor pattern and have made pretty much the minimal changes to use
> Boost.asio's Proactor pattern instead.  So the code isn't quite as neat
> as I'd like.  But that refactoring can wait until later.
>
>>      2.  Boostify the source code per the documented boost guidelines.
>>          This includes:
>>
>>          a.  Reorganizing the source directories
>>          b.  changing header & source files to use boost standards for
>>              license, include paths, macros, etc
>
> I've done most of this, but I have a few more TODOs on my list.
>
>> c.  making the project compile with bjam
>
> This is my next major task.
>
> -- 
> Jon Biggar
> Floorboard Software
> jon_at_[hidden]
> jon_at_[hidden]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>