Re: [boost] [math] pow redux and observations

From: John Moeller (fishcorn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-22 18:47:22

Bruno Lalande <bruno.lalande <at> gmail.com> writes:

> ...
> > There is something called the const-forwarding type that resolves to value 
for built-ins and const refs
> for UDT that might be useful here.
> 
> Usually to solve this problem I simply use call_traits::param_type, is
> there any objection to this?

That's precisely the tool I was thinking of.  For some reason, I had it in my 
mind that it was constructed for an example, and not actually somewhere in 
boost.

> > Finally, something that no one seems to be concerned about in this thread, >
> ...
> OK I'll take a closer look at how the executable size changes with the
> different implementations, indeed it's a point I've forgotten a bit...

Can't that problem be solved by stripping symbols?

John M.