From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-22 19:56:25
on Wed May 21 2008, "Zach Laine" <whatwasthataddress-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:19 AM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Paths don't have leaves. They have beginnings, endings, and middles.
>> They are linear.
> This sheds their context. The linear sequence does not exist in a
> vacuum. It is a sequence of nodes that defines a path through a
> filesystem tree. When I think of a filesystem, I think of it as (a)
> root node(s), interior nodes, and leaf nodes. The fact that I'm only
> looking at a subset of them when dealing with a given path does not
> change what kind of node each is conceptually.
I think that proves my point. On a Unix system "/usr" is never a leaf
in the filesystem. Boost.Filesystem can call it a leaf, though.
> In short, I like "leaf()".
I don't understand why.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk