From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-22 21:11:57
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Simonson, Lucanus J
> I vote we leave the pow template alone, since it isn't broken and
> doesn't need fixing. (Yes I know my vote doesn't count.)
Runtime-wise, it may be fine, yes.
The gain is in going from O(N) template instantiations to O(log N),
which helps at compile-time.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk