Re: [boost] [MultiIndex] Why do constructions of multi_indx_base_type<> andmulti_index_node_type<> differ?

From: Grzegorz Jakacki (jakackipub_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-24 19:30:56

Hi Joaquin,

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The seemingly superfluous nth_layer stuff was added in Boost 1.33
> in order to help reduce the length of the resulting type names

[snip details]

Thanks for an excellent explanation.

> Any particular reason why you're studying the internals of B.MI?

In am dissecting MultiIndex with my students in C++ template
meta-programming course. This lib is an amazing piece of work.

> You're certainly a brave folk

LOL!

> Get back if you need further help.

Posting another question in a new thread.

Thanks a lot!
Greg