From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-28 10:25:20
Anthony Williams wrote:
> OK. t.joinable() /really/ means t represents a thread of
Out of curiosity: Why do you consider a detached thread not to be a
"thread of execution" ?
I can use all the usual means like mutexes and conditions across
detached threads, can't I ?
(And even the 'main' thread is one, as you have stated, even though it's
impossible to obtain a thread object for it.)
> However, the implication of the word is "t can be joined",
> which is too narrow. t.attached() could indeed be read to mean "not
> detached", which is also not really correct.
> t.represents_a_thread() would be strictly correct, but is a bit
> t.has_thread() is shorter.
I find these really confusing since the word 'thread' appears in two
very distinct meanings here. (first as the type of 't', then as "thread
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk