Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Johan Torp (johan.torp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-28 12:05:48

Next message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [Units] A first step to ease the usage of Units' quantities inside of functors created with the Lambda library"
Previous message: Daniel Walker: "[boost] [vault] polymorphic_function call wrapper"
In reply to: Anthony Williams: "Re: [boost] "joinable""
Next in thread: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] "joinable""
Reply: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] "joinable""

Anthony Williams-4 wrote:
>
>>> t.has_thread() is shorter.
>>>
>>
>> I find these really confusing since the word 'thread' appears in two
>> very distinct meanings here. (first as the type of 't', then as "thread
>> of execution".)
>
> Yes, I did worry about that. Any more ideas?
>

represents_execution, has_handle, has_os_handle, is_empty.
I think attached/is_attached is better though.

Johan

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%22joinable%22-tp17503906p17516200.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Next message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [Units] A first step to ease the usage of Units' quantities inside of functors created with the Lambda library"
Previous message: Daniel Walker: "[boost] [vault] polymorphic_function call wrapper"
In reply to: Anthony Williams: "Re: [boost] "joinable""
Next in thread: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] "joinable""
Reply: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] "joinable""

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk