Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Johan Torp (johan.torp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-28 15:49:21

Next message: Daniel Walker: "Re: [boost] [vault] polymorphic_function call wrapper"
Previous message: Paul Baxter: "Re: [boost] the beginning of a pattern/gesture recognition library"
In reply to: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] "joinable""
Next in thread: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] "joinable""
Reply: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] "joinable""

Howard Hinnant wrote:
>
> I agree with Stephan that !attached() implies that the thread was
> detached(), which is inaccurate.
>

You could update the boost documentation and c++ standard to state "attached
to a thread of execution" instead of "represents a thread of execution".
Then a default constructed thread would not be attached to a thread of
execution and only those attached can be joined.

Johan

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%22joinable%22-tp17503906p17520659.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Next message: Daniel Walker: "Re: [boost] [vault] polymorphic_function call wrapper"
Previous message: Paul Baxter: "Re: [boost] the beginning of a pattern/gesture recognition library"
In reply to: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] "joinable""
Next in thread: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] "joinable""
Reply: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] "joinable""

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk