|
Boost : |
From: Anthony Williams (anthony.ajw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-30 06:23:02
Johan Torp <johan.torp_at_[hidden]> writes:
> After thinking more carefully on the problem I've realized it is
> implementable using condition variables. Here is a revised proposal, which -
> for now - excludes barriers.
Given wait_for_any and wait_for_all (see my latest revision), I don't
think we need these more complex composite classes in many cases, and
where we do they might be better implemented specifically for the case
at hand.
Anthony
-- Anthony Williams | Just Software Solutions Ltd Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk