Re: [boost] Non pre-emptible Boost.Thread

From: Edd Dawson (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-30 15:19:14

On 29 May 2008, at 12:49, Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:

> I hope so. I've refactored coroutine's context as a (one shot)
> continuation, which should be usable as a generalized non local
> control flow abstraction.
>
> BTW, I was thinking of adding a task based interface on top of
> continuations in addition of a coroutine interface. Of course Edd's
> library would also work as well.

So can may I infer that you think I should be able to implement my  
library on top of the guts of Boost.Coroutine, now?

The thing that troubled me before was how to implement a default- 
constructed thread (or the stuff in the this_thread namespace in the  
1.35 API).

Kind regards,

Edd