From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-09 12:36:53
My original question about this still stands:
This would seem to mean that the YAML serialization would require
for some types - but not for others. This would mean that YAML archive
be substitutable for other archives - which defeats a large part of the
utility of the archive concept.
This is the interesting question here.
Esteve Fernandez wrote:
> Hi all
> El Lunes 02 Junio 2008 12:31:38 Esteve Fernandez escribió:
>> PS: should I send the patch to this list or is it better to create a
>> new ticket?
> Joel (my mentor) told me to post the patch here. As you can see, it's
> not complete, as the oarchive part is implemented, but not the
> iarchive one. I'm sending it to know if I'm on the good track.
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk