Boost logo

Boost :

From: Jan Gaspar (jano_gaspar_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-11 11:00:57

because: 1) it's behaviour is slightly different from the standard - you can increase but also decrease the capaciry of the container; decreasing of the capacity is not supported by reserve() 2) the word capacity is used all over the documentation of the circular buffer. I think set_capacity expresses better what the method does. Jan ----- Original Message ---- From: Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> To: boost_at_[hidden] Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 3:49:21 PM Subject: Re: [boost] [circular_buffer] why is there no reserve(size_type)? AMDG Jan Gaspar wrote: > it is called set_capacity(capacity_type) > Why is this different from the standard library name? In Christ, Steven Watanabe _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: __________________________________________________________ Sent from Yahoo! Mail. A Smarter Email

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at