From: Jan Gaspar (jano_gaspar_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-11 11:00:57
1) it's behaviour is slightly different from the standard - you can increase but also decrease the capaciry of the container; decreasing of the capacity is not supported by reserve()
2) the word capacity is used all over the documentation of the circular buffer. I think set_capacity expresses better what the method does.
----- Original Message ----
From: Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 3:49:21 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [circular_buffer] why is there no reserve(size_type)?
Jan Gaspar wrote:
> it is called set_capacity(capacity_type)
Why is this different from the standard library name?
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk