From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-24 00:35:07
Fully agreed and I didn't mean to suggest otherwise. There will be a
small improvement in that distracting and irrelevant details like
sizeof won't appear.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 23, 2008, at 6:48 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]>
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Without knowing anything about how good the error messages are that
>> gets from static_assert, I'd say "probably.
> I rather doubt that implementing BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT in terms
> of static_assert is going to create significantly better error
> messages, since
> it will still be a generic error message.
> In Christ,
> Steven Watanabe
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk