Re: [boost] range_ex: status?

From: Neil Groves (neilgroves_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-29 14:43:49

Jeff Flinn wrote:
>
> Yes, I'd add a vote to see make_***_range variants of counting, 
> transformed, filtered, reversed and indirect.
>
> Thanks, Jeff
An update to the Boost.RangeEx proposal has been uploaded to the vault. 
Please take note that Eric has moved his older version of Boost.RangeEx 
(upon which much of the later work is based). I have therefore placed 
the new version in the Algorithms folder of the vault and removed the 
version in the root.

The updated code is to allow make_***_range as requested by a few users 
of RangeEx.

Feedback is welcomed.

Neil Groves