From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-01 13:57:15
David Abrahams wrote:
> Daryle Walker wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
>>> Rene Rivera wrote:
>>>> Just noticed this directory name:
>>>> Is "+" safe to use across file systems?
>>> No, not in general.
>>>> Hm, actually I'm fairly sure more than one "." is not safe. For
>>>> example in the MVS systems?
>>> IIRC, there are several legacy file systems that don't support
>>> multiple periods.
>>> I'll change the offending name. It was one I use internally, and
>>> decided to add to SVN without reconsidering the naming.
>> So, should we add a rule about non-ISO9660 names to our file-checking
>> program, and maybe the subversion pre-commit hook (as Dave said)?
> I vote yes
We need to decide what our standard is first. ISO-9660:1999 limits:
* Allowable characters characters are uppercase A-Z, 0-9, and
underscore. Popular operating systems extend these to at least lowercase
letters, but usually allow more punctuation characters.
* File names shall not include spaces.
* File names shall not start or end with the dot character.
* File names shall not have more than one dot.
* Directory names shall not use dots at all.
If we allow lowercase letters, and add a restriction that the first
character has to be a letter or number, but otherwise stick with
ISO-9660:1999, 1.35.0 would have 773 violations. See
If we also allow '-', that would cut the violations to 130. See
Note that a-z, A-Z, 0-9, dot, hyphen, and underscore correspond to the
POSIX portable file name requirements. So that seems to be a natural
cut-off point for the allowable characters.
Do we also want to drop the "File names shall not have more than one
dot" and/or "Directory names shall not use dots at all" requirements?
Have we have ever had a complaint about multiple dots in file or
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk