|
Boost : |
From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-02 08:08:46
2008/7/2 Daniel James <daniel_james_at_[hidden]>:
>> It seems pretty straight forward to me
>
> But doesn't it change the behaviour of any library which uses your
> library? That's why I said it seems disruptive.
Sorry, I just took another look at your library - and I realized that
BOOST_EXCEPTION_DISABLE doesn't do what I thought it does. I'd assumed
that it disabled exceptions but I now see that it doesn't. Ignore
everything I wrote, what you suggested is very sensible. And you
probably should define it.
Daniel
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk