From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-02 18:53:52
Eric Niebler wrote:
> Joel de Guzman wrote:
>> Eric Niebler wrote:
>>> BOOST_TYPEOF can't perfectly distinguish between lvalues and
>> Yeah, that's my basic problem with BOOST_TYPEOF.
>>> I fudge it where I have to,
>> Where do you fudge it? if_then expression? How? How about ordinary
>> operators like a + b? Do you simply not allow weird uses like:
>> X& operator+(A a, B b)
>> return a reference??
> I use BOOST_TYPEOF to get the type of an expression. Then, I check to
> see if the expression can bind to a non-const reference using the sizeof
> trick. If it does, then I treat the result as an lvalue and add a
> reference to the expression's type. It gets the answer wrong for
> const-qualified rvalues, but in the above example, it would correctly
> deduce the type of "A()+B()" to be "X&".
Ah. Makes perfect sense.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk