Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-07 11:59:24

Next message: Michael Marcin: "Re: [boost] determining if an object is faster to pass by value or const reference"
Previous message: Michael Marcin: "Re: [boost] determining if an object is faster to pass by value or const reference"
In reply to: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [fusion] fusion sequence of non-copy-constructible types"
Next in thread: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [fusion] fusion sequence of non-copy-constructible types"
Reply: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [fusion] fusion sequence of non-copy-constructible types"

Joel de Guzman wrote:

> Can you do "emplace" without move-construct? With a non-C++0x compiler?
> What am I missing?

Well, Boost.optional has been doing it for years already.
The only problem is correctly forwarding the arguments of the constructor.

Next message: Michael Marcin: "Re: [boost] determining if an object is faster to pass by value or const reference"
Previous message: Michael Marcin: "Re: [boost] determining if an object is faster to pass by value or const reference"
In reply to: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [fusion] fusion sequence of non-copy-constructible types"
Next in thread: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [fusion] fusion sequence of non-copy-constructible types"
Reply: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [fusion] fusion sequence of non-copy-constructible types"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view