Re: [boost] [fusion] fusion sequence of non-copy-constructible types

From: oliver (oliver.mueller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-08 07:53:48

Joel de Guzman <joel <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
> 
> Ok, thanks to other folks for reminding me of in_place_factory.
> So, yes, in_place is indeed the solution here. I'm not sure though
> when I can have the time to actually implement it, so first, I'll
> ask the OP (Oliver Mueller) to add a trac ticket for this item.

trac ticket added.

> 
> In the meantime, I welcome contributions. Implementing this shouldn't
> be too hard, but it involves modifying a couple of container classes
> to take in the lazy factories. Hmmm... come to think of it, a lot
> of fusion functions can also take advantage of it (push_back, etc.).
> 
> Any takers? 
> 
> Regards,

since i need it i will try to get something working for vector first...hope
there is not too much preprocessor magic going on in there:)