Re: [boost] [fusion] fusion sequence of non-copy-constructible types

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-08 08:32:53

Joel de Guzman wrote:
> oliver wrote:
>> Joel de Guzman <joel <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
>>> Ok, thanks to other folks for reminding me of in_place_factory.
>>> So, yes, in_place is indeed the solution here. I'm not sure though
>>> when I can have the time to actually implement it, so first, I'll
>>> ask the OP (Oliver Mueller) to add a trac ticket for this item.
>>
>> trac ticket added.
>>
>>> In the meantime, I welcome contributions. Implementing this shouldn't
>>> be too hard, but it involves modifying a couple of container classes
>>> to take in the lazy factories. Hmmm... come to think of it, a lot
>>> of fusion functions can also take advantage of it (push_back, etc.).
>>>
>>> Any takers?
>>> Regards,
>>
>> since i need it i will try to get something working for vector 
>> first...hope
>> there is not too much preprocessor magic going on in there:)
> 
> Haha! Hide, Joel, hide!!! :-)

Seriously, thanks in advance!

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boostpro.com
http://spirit.sf.net